[IMAGE]Attention Internet Radio Fans[IMAGE]

Greetings Internet Radio Fans -
Thanks to the LOUD outcry surrounding the royalty rates set by the Librarian of Congress, three U.S. Representatives have introduced the Internet Radio Fairness Act.
This bill is in the House of Representatives currently, and needs your support!
We need each and every one of our listeners and broadcasters to FAX CONGRESS in support of the Internet Radio Fairness Act.
Feel free to use this link:
Voice of Webcasters
It will take two minutes, and it costs nothing. These two minutes will help preserve the diversity of choices that Internet Radio offers.
Then, visit the Live365 activist page for more ways you can help.
Live365.com Activist Site
We have a window of time to make an impact. Speak now!!
Thank you!
Willie C.
Visit the Beach Music Cafe
Listen to the Cafe at:
WillieCs Rhythm N Beach Classics and Top 40

We are all in danger of losing Internet radio!  This will happen on May 21st without your help. Please see the following letter which contains information and links regarding this serious matter.

If you do NOT want to lose Internet radio, please feel free to copy this letter and mail it to your Congressmen with your signature.

(your name and address)

May 1, 2002

Dear Senator or Representative:

I am writing you to express my strong fear that the U.S. Copyright Office may be about to make a decision on May 21st that will bankrupt and effectively destroy the Internet radio industry.

Let me begin by clarifying that this issue is not about Napster in fact, quite the opposite. Internet radio is a perfectly legal new medium that offers wonderful benefits for musicians and record companies as well
as for consumers. (Record company revenues from CD sales may well be at risk in this "digital millennium," but, if so, that would be due to the phenomena of MP3 file sharing and CD burning, not due to Internet radio.)

Internet radio is a young but fast-growing medium. Tens of millions of Americans have sampled it, according to a study available at
www.Arbitron.com, and the number of loyal Internet radio listeners in the U.S. is in the millions and growing at over 100% per year, according to studies available at www.Measurecast.com. Internet radio is a medium that does NOT deserve to be bankrupted and shut down in just a few weeks.

When Congress passed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in 1998, it seems to have been led to believe that because Internet radio is "digital," record company revenues were at risk because consumers could
make "perfect" copies of the music they hear. In 2002, it's clear that was a misrepresentation of the facts: First, people do not make copies of the music played on Internet radio. Second, even if they could, Internet radio
is almost always delivered in a reduced-quality format, much lower than that of CDs or even FM radio. Thus, any copies made would be "perfect" copies -- but of a low-quality original! (It's a misrepresentation of what
"digital" means.)

As required by the DMCA, however, the Copyright Office is nonetheless obligated to set a "sound recordings performance royalty" rate for Internet radio. But the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP) that
was convened last summer has reached a conclusion that is probably far more draconian than anything Congress intended.

For most Webcasters, the critical issues in front of the Librarian of Congress are:

(#1) The CARP arbitrators set a royalty rate that's far, far higher than
the royalty rate paid by broadcasters and webcasters to composers (based
almost exclusively on a single deal during the height of the dotcom craze
between Yahoo! and the RIAA).

(#2) The CARP arbitrators recommended a fixed price per song streamed per
listener, rejecting a alternative "percentage of gross revenues" royalty
concept that both sides had previously been willing to accept, and

(#3) The Copyright Office has proposed recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, precisely as requested by the RIAA, that are wildly beyond
the abilities of most webcasters to fulfill.

May 1, 2002 Page 2

From: (your name)
To: Senator or Representative

Regarding the first two points above: The RIAA initially asked webcasters for a royalty of 15% of gross revenues.

Webcasters initially countered by offering approximately 3% of gross revenues, in the range of the royalty
they pay to composers. They could not come to terms, so the two sides went to arbitration in front of the CARP. The CARP's recommendation to the Copyright Office, however, is not a percentage of gross revenues at all,
but rather a price per song per listener -- at a price that, even if webcasters could eventually achieve the same advertising success that broadcasters have achieved, would work out to a royalty rate of 20% of
gross revenues! (That's a third more than the RIAA asked for!) Worse yet, in the current advertising environment, the CARP's proposed rate equates to a royalty rate closer to 200% to 300% of gross revenues!

Worse yet again, the royalties are retroactive to October 1998. For a popular independent webcaster that has had, say, an average audience of 1,000 listeners (fewer than a single small-market broadcast radio station)
for the past three years, the bill for retroactive royalties would be $525,600, or a retroactive royalty rate of 500% to 1000% of their gross revenues to date. Without the option of a "percentage of gross revenues"
royalty rate, this retroactive obligation alone will bankrupt or force the shutdown of the vast majority of webcasters.

It's hard to imagine that this is what Congress had in mind when it passed the DMCA.

How did the CARP arbitrators come up with such a high proposed royalty rate? Because they were instructed to set the rate based on the principle of what a "willing buyer" and "willing seller" would agree to...and there
was only one such arrangement, between the RIAA and Yahoo! The financial situation of Yahoo! was unique, as they had just paid over $5 billion to acquire an Internet radio division (Broadcast.com). Furthermore, it was a
deal put together at the height of the "dotcom" boom. The agreement made by Yahoo! with the RIAA does not reflect current market conditions and it should not serve as a representative rate baseline for an entire industry

As mentioned above, the Copyright Office has also proposed complex reporting requirements from webcasters, almost exactly as requested by the RIAA (18 pieces of information for every song that's played and 7 pieces
of information on every listener that listens). Imposing this requirement would require significant additional expense that would force many smaller webcasters off the air and add an unnecessary financial burden to the
larger ones, with no apparent benefit to any one.

In conclusion, if the Librarian sets a royalty rate along the lines of the CARP recommendation (and sets the reporting requirements as proposed), Internet radio as an industry will be effectively dead by the end of May.

I respectfully urge you to communicate to the Librarian of Congress that you and your fellow legislators, in passing the DMCA, did NOT intend for the royalty rate to be set so high (and reporting requirements so complex)
that it would bankrupt the fledgling Internet radio industry.

Many of your constituents and I will greatly appreciate your attention to this concern.

(your name and signature)


Music Lovers have visited this site. Counting your visitors is easy with 123Counter!

Want To Join P.O.O.L. Click Gif

Presently 812 Membership Sites


To Join P.O.O.L. You Must Have A Website

Click Here To See If Your Site Qualifies For P.O.O.L

Email: Gary Larkin glarkin@nb.net


WillieCs RnB Beach Music Cafe
SiteRing by Bravenet.com


FastCounter by bCentral
2000 WillieCs RnB Beach Music Cafe   Last Updated 05/05/2002 8:30 AM EDT

Click Arrow to Return to Main Page